Where Soft Law is the Only Law: Digital Goods in Comparative Perspective

Authors

  • Emanuel Sebastian Călin Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanța, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61801/Arsaequi.2025.282

Keywords:

digital goods, digital assets, soft law, regulatory framework, European Union law

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving digital economy, the legal qualification and regulation of digital goods remain ambiguous and fragmented. Despite their growing economic and societal relevance, digital goods are often governed not by binding legal norms (hard law), but by non-binding guidelines, private contracts, and platform-specific terms of service - the so-called soft law. This article explores the legal vacuum surrounding digital goods, analysing the challenges posed by the absence of uniform definitions, the reliance on private ordering, and the inconsistent application of existing legal categories across jurisdictions. Through a comparative and interdisciplinary lens, the study examines how current legal systems struggle to keep pace with technological innovation, resulting in legal uncertainty regarding ownership rights, consumer protection, taxation, and the cross-border transfer of digital goods. The paper argues for the development of a coherent national and European Union regulatory framework that transcends soft law approaches and provides clear, enforceable, and future-proof norms for the classification, use, and transfer of digital goods in a globalised environment.

References

European Law Institute, ELI Principles on the Use of Digital Assets as Security (European Law Institute 2022)

Lehmann M, ‘Digital Assets in the Conflict of Laws’ (2024) Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 197-222

Lourenço PM, ‘The Judicial Officer and Digitisation – Delivering the Added Value: The Human Touch’ in D Walker (ed), Cyberjustice, de nouvelles opportunités pour l’huissier de justice / Cyberjustice, New Opportunities for the Judi-cial Officer: XXIVth International Congress of the International Union of Judicial Officers, Dubai, 22–25 November 2021 (Bruylant 2021)

Păun MG, ‘Digital Discipline: Upholding Ethical Integrity in the Judicial Officer’s Engagement with Technology’ in P Gielen (ed), L’huissier de justice : le tiers de confiance / The Judicial Officer: The Trusted Third Party (Bruylant 2024)

Shaw M, International Law (6th edn, Cambridge University Press 2008)

UIHJ, Global Code of Digital Enforcement (Bruylant 2021)

UNIDROIT, UNIDROIT Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law (UNIDROIT 2023)

Van Erp S, ‘Ownership of Digital Assets’ (2016) 5(2) European Property Law Journal 73-76

Van Erp S, ‘Digital Assets… The “Phantom Debtor”’ in D Walker (ed), Cyberjustice, de nouvelles opportunités pour l’huissier de justice / Cyberjustice, New Opportunities for the Judicial Officer: XXIVth International Congress of the International Union of Judicial Officers, Dubai, 22–25 November 2021 (Bruylant 2021)

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Călin, E. S. (2025). Where Soft Law is the Only Law: Digital Goods in Comparative Perspective. Ars æqui, 15(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.61801/Arsaequi.2025.282

Issue

Section

Studies and articles