The Social Order as a Normative Order. Reflections on the Plurality of Rules of Conduct
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61801/Arsaequi.2025.266Keywords:
social order, normative order, plurality of norms, values, pluralism, legitimacy of law, fragility of orderAbstract
This article explores the idea of social order as a fundamentally normative construction. Drawing on philosophy, legal theory, and sociology, it argues that order cannot be reduced to mere coexistence or to the coercive force of the state but must be understood as the fragile balance between values, norms, and institutions. Legal norms occupy a central role due to their institutionalization and state guarantee, yet their legitimacy and effectiveness depend on their consonance with moral, religious, customary, deontological, and technical rules. The study emphasizes that plurality is both the richness and the vulnerability of social order: while diverse systems of regulation complement and enrich one another, they also generate conflicts and contestations. Historical examples and contemporary crises, from the persistence of custom to debates on fundamental rights, from the COVID-19 pandemic to challenges posed by artificial intelligence, illustrate the permanent negotiation between letter and spirit, between coercion and consensus. The conclusion is that social order should be understood not as a fixed state, but as a regulative ideal, constantly reconstructed and reshaped by cultural, political, and technological transformations.
References
Carré de Malberg R, Contribution à la théorie générale de l’État (Sirey 1920)
Craiovan I, Tratat de teoria generală a dreptului (Universul Juridic 2015)
Del Vecchio G, Lecții de filosofie juridică (Europa Nova 1996)
Djuvara M, Teoria generală a dreptului (ALL 1995)
Durkheim É, The Division of Labour in Society (Free Press 1997)
Filitti IC, Obiceiul pământului în dreptul românesc (Editura Academiei 1936)
Habermas J, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (William Rehg tr, MIT Press 1996)
Hobbes T, Leviathan (first published 1651, reprint Penguin Classics 1985)
Jhering R von, Law as a Means to an End (Isaac Husik tr, The Boston Book Company 1913)
Kelsen H, Teoria pură a dreptului (Humanitas 2000)
Luhmann N, Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press 2004)
Popa N, Teoria generală a dreptului (5th edn, C.H. Beck 2019)
Radbruch G, ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
Rădulescu SM, Homo Sociologicus. Raționalitate și iraționalitate în acțiunea umană (Casa de Editură și Presă „Șansa” 1994)
Vianu T, Estetica (Minerva 1971)
Voicu M, ‘Jurisprudența – expresia vie a normei juridice și fundamentul construcției normative’ (2017) Revista Română de Drept Privat
Weber M, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press 1978)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Editura Solomon.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)

.png)

