Violation of the principle of proportionality of criminalization in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova
Keywords:
incrimination; proportionality of incrimination; the principle of proportionality of incrimination; the principle of protection of legal interests; the ultima ratio principleAbstract
The object of the present study is the understanding of the notions of “incrimination” and “proportionality of incrimination”. Also, the two facets of the principle of proportionality of incrimination are analyzed: the principle of protection of legal interests and the ultima ratio principle. The following are the most relevant examples of violations by the Moldovan legislator of the principle of protection of legal interests and the ultima ratio principle. It is concluded that the dynamics of the development of social relations obliges the legislator to combine the processes of criminalization and decriminalization of acts. Only a balanced use of these criminal policy instruments can ensure the effective protection of the most important social values, without admitting the disproportionate restriction of the exercise of certain rights or freedoms.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ars Aequi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share and adapt the material for any purpose, even commercially, as long as proper credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication. For images or other third-party material included in the article, please check the individual credit lines for licensing information.